Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Mertz Loses GOP Support
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Rotterdam Politics  ›  Mertz Loses GOP Support Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
AdSense and 5 Guests

Mertz Loses GOP Support  This thread currently has 5,856 views. |
12 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 » Recommend Thread
papanetta67
September 28, 2008, 10:04pm Report to Moderator
Full Member
Posts
270
Time Online
12 days 6 hours 20 minutes
Quoted from CaptainAmerica




News Flash----- Mertz is Bumble


Really......what was the 1st clue????  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 30 - 169
MobileTerminal
September 28, 2008, 10:19pm Report to Moderator

Out of NY and LOVING it!
Hero Member
Posts
9,413
Reputation
67.86%
Reputation Score
+19 / -9
Time Online
362 days 12 hours 19 minutes
Bumble is not Mertz - get over yourselves. Your detective skills suck guys.


Vivat Jesus
Knights of Columbus, Fourth Degree
In Him, all things are possible
Logged
Private Message Reply: 31 - 169
senders
September 28, 2008, 10:59pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
17,374
Reputation
76.19%
Reputation Score
+16 / -5
Time Online
78 days 10 hours 15 minutes
please pass the popcorn and this time the 3D glasses too.......


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 32 - 169
B GAGE
September 28, 2008, 11:50pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
565
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+3 / -2
Time Online
10 days 6 hours 43 minutes
Quoted from bumblethru
Thanks for the compliment, but I assure you that I am not Mertz. I've said it a million times....if I WERE Mertz...the police commission would be in existence today!. Got it?

Like I said....DEFLATE THE PARTY! No members = No money = No power!!! It's a no brainer!

Ya the police commission    that was a good thing!!!!

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 33 - 169
JoAnn
September 29, 2008, 1:35pm Report to Moderator

Administrator Group
Posts
1,996
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+3 / -2
Time Online
19 days 7 hours 5 minutes

I have been hearing conflicting stories about the GOP "party" not supporting John Mertz in the next election. There are some people who are saying that it was Gerard Parisi who made that decision independent from the committee.

Does anyone know if this is an accurate assessment?
Logged
Private Message Reply: 34 - 169
Salvatore
September 29, 2008, 8:12pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
1,830
Reputation
28.57%
Reputation Score
+4 / -10
Time Online
21 days 5 hours 52 minutes
this will require a full sherlock homes treatment over there since I would like some more facts too
Logged
Private Message Reply: 35 - 169
JRaup
September 29, 2008, 8:44pm Report to Moderator

Jr. Member
Posts
171
Time Online
4 days 34 minutes
Quoted from bumblethru
I agree with you in theory only. What you suggest is the way it 'should' work. But it doesn't. Abandoning a party, registering as a blank and yet still 'voting' your ideology, is clearly the only way to go. It would only take ONE year to accomplish a change. And during this process, there should be NO monetary contributions to any particular party. Instead, contributions should be given to the candidate you support only. (just think of the campaign mailers that action would eliminate ) Collectively....it would work! Let them chase us 'blanks' around for our vote.

Our political parties are lacking in leadership, vision and governing ability. They are greedy and power driven by political and personal motives.  And we the taxpayers are literally getting screwed over. WE MUST TAKE BACK OUR GOVERNMENT....DEFLATE THE PARTY!!!


The problem with this is that the candidates are still going to come out of the existing party structures.  Worse, it will only impact the Republican party.  the democrats are not going to chase your vote.  They'll just rely on the same people they always do, those who blindly and blanketly vote for whoever is on the democratic line.  The part leadership (such that it is), is not going to change unless someone, or some poeple, from with in challenge the existing power people.  All this ends up doing is emasculating the Rpeublican Party to the point of being unable to do anything more than run out some scaraficial candidates just to maintain a presence.  In addition, with out that Party support, even fewer qualified candidates will even bother to seek office.  I only see this sort of action as doing more harm than good.

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 36 - 169
bumblethru
September 29, 2008, 10:31pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
19,477
Reputation
75.76%
Reputation Score
+25 / -8
Time Online
96 days 9 hours 38 minutes
I also heard (and this can just be rumor) that Mr. Parisi made this press release to the gazette without the knowledge of the the entire GOP committee.


01.20.2013
THE END OF AN ERROR
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 37 - 169
senders
September 29, 2008, 10:53pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
17,374
Reputation
76.19%
Reputation Score
+16 / -5
Time Online
78 days 10 hours 15 minutes
Sometimes 'politicians' (or friends thereof) like to drop a pebble to test the waters.....nothing is ever set in stone......hhhmmm....wallstreet anyone???


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 38 - 169
bumblethru
September 29, 2008, 11:30pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
19,477
Reputation
75.76%
Reputation Score
+25 / -8
Time Online
96 days 9 hours 38 minutes
Quoted from JoAnn

I have been hearing conflicting stories about the GOP "party" not supporting John Mertz in the next election. There are some people who are saying that it was Gerard Parisi who made that decision independent from the committee.

Does anyone know if this is an accurate assessment?
How do we find out who is on the Republican committee?



01.20.2013
THE END OF AN ERROR
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 39 - 169
Brad Littlefield
September 30, 2008, 11:56pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
1,452
Reputation
73.33%
Reputation Score
+11 / -4
Time Online
29 days 10 hours 10 minutes


Don't give up on John Mertz.  It is my understanding that Mr. Parisi spoke only on behalf of himself and
not on behalf of the committee.  

Just because some may want it to be so, doesn't mean that you must accept it.  As an enrolled
Republican, Mr. Mertz would have a lever in a primary election if the party were to award the
endorsement to someone else.  His Republican supporters would have to get out the vote and pull
the lever.


"If we can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them, they must become happy."

- Thomas Jefferson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 40 - 169
bumblethru
October 1, 2008, 12:04am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
19,477
Reputation
75.76%
Reputation Score
+25 / -8
Time Online
96 days 9 hours 38 minutes
I would pull the lever for John Mertz. He always appeared to be the only one on that board that would speak up in defense of the taxpayers. Clearly something you can't do in small town politics. Ya know....don't rock the boat! I'm glad he rocks the boat.

IF Parisi did this on 'his own' behalf..than Parisi clearly has a personal issue with Mertz. And if that is the case, Parisi should NOT be the Rotterdam rep chair. That is NOT doing what is best for the party or it's town residence. Speaking of Rotterdam chair....isn't Parisi the town lawyer too? Wouldn't that be a conflict of interest?


01.20.2013
THE END OF AN ERROR
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 41 - 169
Salvatore
October 1, 2008, 12:28am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
1,830
Reputation
28.57%
Reputation Score
+4 / -10
Time Online
21 days 5 hours 52 minutes
Mr L I like you much but the chairman wouldnt give him the endoresement and that is that and further more the conservs probably wont give him the green light over here in any event my freinds so I say Johnny boy M must consider the retirement over there and leave the job to someone else like Cook or some one else to balance the board and if gets replaced the board ought to put a demo on to even the troubles out and smooth things that would be the right thing to do indeed.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 42 - 169
Shadow
October 1, 2008, 9:17am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,085
Reputation
72.73%
Reputation Score
+16 / -6
Time Online
296 days 22 hours 17 minutes
Sal, why not just say good-bye to Parisi and the problem would be solved.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 43 - 169
bumblethru
October 1, 2008, 10:54pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
19,477
Reputation
75.76%
Reputation Score
+25 / -8
Time Online
96 days 9 hours 38 minutes
The reps are imploding on themselves. The liberal dems control everything with tax and spend. The wfp is just an arm of the dems. The conservs are just thugs. I'm glad I'm a lowly 'blank'!


01.20.2013
THE END OF AN ERROR
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 44 - 169
12 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread