Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Obama waits 4 days!
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Inside Rotterdam  ›  Obama waits 4 days! Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
Walt and 14 Guests

Obama waits 4 days!  This thread currently has 260 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
thisisawesome
December 31, 2009, 3:34pm Report to Moderator
Baby Member
Posts
42
Time Online
1 days 11 hours 15 minutes
Does anyone else find it disturbing that Obama waited four days to speak about the attempted terrorist attack on Christmas Day? I
mean I understand that you are on vacation but for god sake....you are the President of the United States...the laid back approach
bothered me a bit too....maybe I'm the only one but this guys is "amazing"....(not in a good way) Get with it Mr. President and do your
job!!!
Logged Offline
Private Message
bumblethru
December 31, 2009, 3:59pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
19,538
Reputation
75.76%
Reputation Score
+25 / -8
Time Online
96 days 15 hours 17 minutes
The guy is obviously way over his head. Clearly not presidential material! The liberal media and everyone that supported him should be looking for that sharp object to stick in their eye! Or perhaps we could just slap them up side the head and try to knock some sense into them!


01.20.2013
THE END OF AN ERROR
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 12
MobileTerminal
December 31, 2009, 4:05pm Report to Moderator

Out of NY and LOVING it!
Hero Member
Posts
9,443
Reputation
67.86%
Reputation Score
+19 / -9
Time Online
364 days 7 hours 51 minutes
Yet he had the audactiy to criticize Bush for sitting in a classroom and finishing what he was doing when notified that "something" had happened at the WTC.


Vivat Jesus
Knights of Columbus, Fourth Degree
In Him, all things are possible
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 12
alleykat
December 31, 2009, 5:48pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
514
Reputation
25.00%
Reputation Score
+1 / -3
Time Online
12 days 17 hours 35 minutes
I originally thought that as well but the truth is we are wrong.  9/11 is a atotally different issue that this.  Bush waited six days before he spoke out against Richard Reid the shoe bomber.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 12
mikechristine1
January 1, 2010, 2:40am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
2,785
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
40 days 2 hours 1 minutes
Yeah, where's that Michal Moore now?  

Yeah, Bush continued in the classroom.  If he were in a room full of adults he could have reacted differently.  He rightfully didn't jump up and scare those little children.  Maybe if he had been in a high school a junior or senior year perhaps, he could have shown his fear, or said "excuse me a moment we have an emergency."

I mean really, if you were a little child and the president suddenly had the look of fear on his face and ran out of the room without comment, Or if he stood up right there in front of those little children and said we were just attacked, wouldn't you be really scared and want your mommy and daddy.

I'd just like to know why the president didn't know about the warnings about this guy, obviously his desire to make friends with bin laden and co
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 12
alleykat
January 1, 2010, 2:55am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
514
Reputation
25.00%
Reputation Score
+1 / -3
Time Online
12 days 17 hours 35 minutes
Mikechristine nobody is blaming Bush for his reaction at 911.  He acted appropriately in my book.  He was with little kids.  Obama took four days to react to this guy but Bush took SIX days to react to Richard Reid the shoebomber.  That's the point not 9/11.  

Obama making friends with Bin Laden??? LOL  (that was a joke right?)
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 12
MobileTerminal
January 1, 2010, 3:23am Report to Moderator

Out of NY and LOVING it!
Hero Member
Posts
9,443
Reputation
67.86%
Reputation Score
+19 / -9
Time Online
364 days 7 hours 51 minutes
Michelle Malkin addressed some of the differences in the two attacks – and the reactions to them – here:

Quoted Text
   This Politico piece tries to make hay of the supposedly unfair double standard in how Bush was treated during the shoe bomber attack during Christmas 2001 versus the “heat” that Obama is taking now for remaining on holiday.

    A few inconvenient differences and facts that the article glosses over: Bush had been working non-stop since September 11 on homeland security issues and had the public’s trust. The attacks consumed him. By contrast, the current Democratic majority and White House have been working non-stop to lower our defenses and speed the jihadi revolving door.

    In December 2001, Bush had not yet amassed his lousy record on Katrina, Harriet Miers, Dubai Ports, shamnesty, and the massive bailouts (all of which have been lambasted extensively on this website and in my columns over the last four years). In December 2009, Obama has already amassed enough Culture of Corruption material to fill an encyclopedia set.

    And unlike the low-key Bush, President Obama has been a shameless, consummate TV hog from Day One — willing to turn anything and everything, including a race-baiting tiff between his good friend Professor Henry Louis Gates and Cambridge MA police — into a global “teachable moment” of “unprecedented” proportions. When he doesn’t rush to address Americans after a matter of real import strikes, “heat” — no matter how hypocritical his supporters may paint it – is entirely appropriate.


Let’s look at a few other differences:

-Reid wasn’t on any terrorist watch list. Abdulmutallab was.
-Reid’s father didn’t warn the US embassy in his home country the month before Reid planned the attack that he feared his son was “under the influence of religious extremists.” Abdulmutallab’s did.
-Since Reid wasn’t a suspsected terrorist at the time he tried to blow up American Airlines Flight 63, there was no visa issue. The State Dept. failed twice to catch Abdulmutallab’s active visa.
- No one from the DHS went on various talking head shows to announce that “the system worked” in the aftermath of the Richard Reid attempted terror attack.



http://sistertoldjah.com/archi.....le-standard-in-reax/


Vivat Jesus
Knights of Columbus, Fourth Degree
In Him, all things are possible
Logged
Private Message Reply: 6 - 12
GrahamBonnet
January 1, 2010, 3:40am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,509
Reputation
75.00%
Reputation Score
+15 / -5
Time Online
97 days 6 hours 6 minutes
There is no terrorism, only man made disasters according to local democrat/conservatives/police unions. And their guru Obama.


Malleus Democrapum
Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 12
Sombody
January 1, 2010, 10:04am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
1,372
Reputation
57.14%
Reputation Score
+4 / -3
Time Online
135 days 7 hours 33 minutes
Quoted from bumblethru
The guy is obviously way over his head. Clearly not presidential material! The liberal media and everyone that supported him should be looking for that sharp object to stick in their eye! Or perhaps we could just slap them up side the head and try to knock some sense into them!


Remember Bush's response to 2001 Shoe Bomber Attack?

No? Well there's a good reason for that. There wasn't any.

Or rather his response was to continue his Christmas vacation for another 2 weeks before returning to Washington DC and, as far as I can tell, never publicly addressing the matter in any form whatsoever-


Oneida Elementary K-2  Yates 3-6
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 12
pg13
January 1, 2010, 3:29pm Report to Moderator

Sr. Member
Posts
432
Reputation
100.00%
Reputation Score
+2 / -0
Time Online
18 days 2 hours 40 minutes
You're all correct, Bush wasn't a very good President and neither is Obama. IMO, Obama will make Bush look like a wonderful President by the end of his term.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 12
MobileTerminal
January 1, 2010, 4:30pm Report to Moderator

Out of NY and LOVING it!
Hero Member
Posts
9,443
Reputation
67.86%
Reputation Score
+19 / -9
Time Online
364 days 7 hours 51 minutes
Quoted from Sombody


Remember Bush's response to 2001 Shoe Bomber Attack?

No? Well there's a good reason for that. There wasn't any.

Or rather his response was to continue his Christmas vacation for another 2 weeks before returning to Washington DC and, as far as I can tell, never publicly addressing the matter in any form whatsoever-


Let’s look at a few other differences:

-Reid wasn’t on any terrorist watch list. Abdulmutallab was.
-Reid’s father didn’t warn the US embassy in his home country the month before Reid planned the attack that he feared his son was “under the influence of religious extremists.” Abdulmutallab’s did.
-Since Reid wasn’t a suspsected terrorist at the time he tried to blow up American Airlines Flight 63, there was no visa issue. The State Dept. failed twice to catch Abdulmutallab’s active visa.
- No one from the DHS went on various talking head shows to announce that “the system worked” in the aftermath of the Richard Reid attempted terror attack.



Vivat Jesus
Knights of Columbus, Fourth Degree
In Him, all things are possible
Logged
Private Message Reply: 10 - 12
tdonovan
January 5, 2010, 5:35pm Report to Moderator
Jr. Member
Posts
141
Reputation
100.00%
Reputation Score
+1 / -0
Time Online
3 days 5 hours 44 minutes
That is a direct result of playing "nice" with these people. Yeah, and now let's give these people the same rights as us!
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 11 - 12
bumblethru
January 5, 2010, 7:49pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
19,538
Reputation
75.76%
Reputation Score
+25 / -8
Time Online
96 days 15 hours 17 minutes
Quoted from tdonovan
That is a direct result of playing "nice" with these people. Yeah, and now let's give these people the same rights as us!

Give obama another year and people will be screaming to have bush back. I can see the reps cleaning house (no pun intended), in the next election.


01.20.2013
THE END OF AN ERROR
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 12
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread